Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 06:19
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Why is my ex mad I moved on when he dumped me?
Russia can stop this any time.
Just in the last 5 years:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Why did you choose not to join Mensa?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Seven replies to the viral Apple reasoning paper and why they fall short - Hacker News
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Scientists Have Finally Measured How Fast Quantum Entanglement Happens - IFLScience
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Wall Street floods into Bitcoin Futures as CME trader count hits all-time high - AMBCrypto
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Wicked: For Good trailer transports fans back to Oz - BBC
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Thank you.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
How do you think Trump's tariff threats are affecting Europe?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.